Tram Time &
Budget |
|||
| Forecast | Actual | Difference | |
| Ridership | |||
| cost | $9 million (or $3-5 million, take your choice) | $57 million | 533% OVER construction budget |
| operating costs | $480,000 | $1.7 million | 250% OVER operating budget |
| opening date | |||
Construction |
Operating |
Date/link |
Quote from article (we added most of the bold) |
|
| $3 million to $5 million | June 15, 1998 | "The tram would link that center with the main campus, OHSU Vice President Jim Walker said. Early estimates put tram costs at $3 million to $5 million." | ||
| $12 million to $14 million | December 8, 2000 | "Who would pay for the estimated $12 million to $14 million project is not clear. Consultant Gordon Davis said that OHSU would have to raise the money." | ||
| $14 million to $18 million | January 12, 2001 | "The idea for the estimated $14 million to $18 million tramway came out of university planning for a master plan to guide growth for several years. It was presented to the North Macadam Steering Committee in 1997" | ||
| $500,000 to $1 million |
February 1, 2001 | "After installation, a tram's yearly estimated operating cost, in the range of $500,000 to $1 million" | ||
| $9 million | $480,000 | March 1, 2001 | Gordon Davis, a consultant to the university working with engineers on a preliminary study, said estimates show $9 million for design and construction -- compared to a $14 million to $18 million range previously guessed -- and $480,000 a year for operation. | |
| $600,000 | March 7, 2001 | Preliminary engineering work shows project costs of about $9 million for design, construction and putting utility lines underground, and operating costs of about $600,000 a year. The numbers total several million dollars less than earlier estimates. | ||
| $16 million | July 10, 2002 | "It's too expensive," Commissioner Jim Francesconi, who oversees transportation, said about Howell's tunnel idea...The office guesses that it would cost between $50 and $80 million to build --... -- compared with about $16 million for a tram. | ||
| $9.5-$10.5 million minimum | July 21, 2002 | "Zidell points out that even if the tram's cost goes well beyond the $9.5-$10.5 million minimum needed to build it, that's just a fraction of the money going into redeveloping North Macadam." | ||
| $17 million | January 4, 2003 | "With a preliminary budget of $17 million for the project, PATI is asking the firms to design, the tram, towers and stations as well as a pedestrian bridge " | ||
| $15.5 million | March 13, 2003 | "But decisions about how the $15.5 million project will be financed and who will operate it are open." | ||
| $24 million - $30.2 million | November 15, 2003 | "Figures issued Friday suggest that the tram...could cost between $24 million and $30.2 million, far exceeding the original budget of $15.5 million." | ||
| $40 million | April 29, 2005 | "The City Council also approves improvement projects for neighborhoods in the tram's path....A unanimous Portland City Council gave the final green light on Thursday to a $40 million aerial tram" | ||
| $45 million | October 22, 2005 | "SUMMARY: South Waterfront The aerial tram might now cost Portland $45 million, nearly triple the estimate from 2003" | ||
| may be "closer to $60 million." | January 12, 2006 | "It's a dream of ours," Leonard recalls Kohler saying. "It's something we believe in."..."the final cost may be 'closer to $60 million.'" | ||
| $45 million | January 13, 2006 | "Portland Commissioners want to know why city staff knowingly relied on flawed estimates, which have tripled" | ||
| $55 million | February 2, 2006 | "The aerial tram's cost to link Pill Hill to South Waterfront has more than tripled in three years to $55 million" | ||
| .She didn't consider it her job to watch the budge | March 16, 2006 | "then-Mayor Vera Katz pushed for a postcard-pretty design to bind the city's largest employer to its newest neighborhood....She didn't consider it her job to watch the budget. Unfortunately, no one else at City Hall did either." | ||
| $57.6 million | April 7, 2006 | "He now says he'll back a tentative $57.6 million funding plan that calls for the city to more than double its contribution. Under the proposal, the city's share would rise from $3.5 million to $8.5 million." | ||
| $57 million | $1.7 million | Jan 9, 2007 | "According to Adams, since the recommendations were accepted, the construction budget increased from $28 million to $57 million and the annual operating budget grew from $915,000 to $1.7 million. (Math: $1.7e6/365 = $4657 per DAY)" | |